Ancient Monuments

History on the Ground

This site is entirely user-supported. See how you can help.

Site of Langley Palace royal hunting lodge, an associated enclosure and later garden earthworks at Langley Farm

A Scheduled Monument in Leafield, Oxfordshire

We don't have any photos of this monument yet. Why don't you be the first to send us one?

Upload Photo »

Approximate Location Map
Large Map »

If Google Street View is available, the image is from the best available vantage point looking, if possible, towards the location of the monument. Where it is not available, the satellite view is shown instead.

Coordinates

Latitude: 51.8378 / 51°50'16"N

Longitude: -1.5729 / 1°34'22"W

OS Eastings: 429526.426916

OS Northings: 215550.533331

OS Grid: SP295155

Mapcode National: GBR 5SK.R58

Mapcode Global: VHBZT.P2CH

Entry Name: Site of Langley Palace royal hunting lodge, an associated enclosure and later garden earthworks at Langley Farm

Scheduled Date: 1 November 1967

Last Amended: 17 January 1995

Source: Historic England

Source ID: 1008495

English Heritage Legacy ID: 21805

County: Oxfordshire

Civil Parish: Leafield

Traditional County: Oxfordshire

Lieutenancy Area (Ceremonial County): Oxfordshire

Church of England Parish: Shipton-under-Wychwood

Church of England Diocese: Oxford

Details

The monument at Langley Farm includes the site of Langley Palace royal hunting
lodge, partly enclosed by a bank to the west and north and, originally, to the
east, a surrounding and probably earlier oval enclosure defined by a bank and
ditch, part of an associated avenue and the earthwork remains of formal
gardens. It also includes the buried remains of a manor and part of a medieval
settlement which were recorded at the site but which were deserted and built
over when the hunting lodge was constructed. The site lies south west of
Leafield Barrow motte and immediately south of the Marconi signal station.
The royal hunting lodge survives in part as a building incorporated into the
fabric of the present Grade II* Listed farmhouse; the two-storey bay window of
the original hall, for instance, is still visible. The site of the lodge is
further defined by a bank to the west and north, and originally to the east,
delimiting an area some 35m wide and 75m long. This earthwork is thought to
date to a major phase of rebuilding. It provided a raised walkway, up to 12m
across and possibly accessible via a bridge from the first floor of the lodge,
from which the surrounding formal gardens could have been viewed.
Outside the bank to the north and west are the earthwork remains of formal
gardens, surviving as a series of low banks and depressions up to 5m wide and
0.5m high. Those to the west are arranged along an avenue which is shown as
the main access to the site on a map of 1855. This avenue continues as a
slight earthwork for c.90m beyond the gardens remains.
The core of the site is included within an oval enclosure originally defined
by a bank and ditch. To the south, the line of the earthworks is buried
beneath the modern road line. Elsewhere the bank can be traced in places up to
1m high and 3m wide and the ditch, largely infilled but surviving as a buried
feature, as shallow depressions up to a 0.2m deep and 3m wide. This oval
enclosure, measuring c.200m east-west by c.140m north-south, may have
originally defended the lodge but could also date back to the earlier manor
which existed on the site.
From documentary records it is known that the early manor and associated
village were deserted some time after 1450. In 1478 the manor passed into
crown ownership and Henry VII had a royal hunting lodge built on the site. His
initials can be seen carved on the soffit of the bay window in the present
farmhouse, along with a Tudor rose. Further sculptured masonry from the site
can be seen incorporated in the later cottages c.500m to the south east.
The site continued to be used by the court until 1614 and remains in crown
ownership.
The present farmhouse was rebuilt in 1858, incorporating many elements of the
earlier structures which it replaced.
Excluded from the scheduling are the present farm buildings, including the
Grade II* Listed farmhouse, the farmyard surface, the road surface, the post
and wire boundary fences, the garden walls and the disused reservoir north of
the farmhouse, although the ground beneath all of the above features is
included.

MAP EXTRACT
The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.

Source: Historic England

Reasons for Scheduling

Deer parks were areas of land, usually enclosed, set aside and equipped for
the management and hunting of deer and other animals. They were generally
located in open countryside on marginal land or adjacent to a manor house,
castle or palace. They varied in size between 3ha and 1600ha and usually
comprised a combination of woodland and grassland which provided a mixture of
cover and grazing for deer. Parks could contain a number of features,
including hunting lodges (often moated), a park-keeper's house, rabbit
warrens, fishponds and enclosures for game, and were usually surrounded by a
park pale, a massive fenced or hedged bank often with an internal ditch.
Although a small number of parks may have been established in the Anglo-Saxon
period, it was the Norman aristocracy's taste for hunting that led to the
majority being constructed. The peak period for the laying-out of parks,
between AD 1200 and 1350, coincided with a time of considerable prosperity
amongst the nobility. From the 15th century onwards few parks were constructed
and by the end of the 17th century the deer park in its original form had
largely disappeared. The original number of deer parks nationally is unknown
but probably exceeded 3000. Many of these survive today, although often
altered to a greater or lesser degree. They were established in virtually
every county in England, but are most numerous in the West Midlands and Home
Counties. Deer parks were a long-lived and widespread monument type. Today
they serve to illustrate an important aspect of the activities of medieval
nobility and still exert a powerful influence on the pattern of the modern
landscape. Where a deer park survives well and is well-documented or
associated with other significant remains, its principal features are normally
identified as nationally important.

The royal hunting lodge at Langley forms a central component in the deer park
of the ancient Wychwood Forest. It occupies the site of an earlier manor and
well documented medieval village, the remains of which survive buried beneath
later earthworks and structures. The hunting lodge has a documented connection
with Henry VII and the activities of the English court over a period of nearly
200 years. Its location here directly affected the siting nearby of several
manors, occupied by members of the court who wanted to live close-by when the
king was in residence. The motte castle at Leafield is probably related to the
defence of the royal court and its estate.
Together, the hunting lodge, the motte at Leafield Barrow and associated
manorial settlements, constitute an unusual group of related monuments
representing social and political aspects of a medieval royal court.

Source: Historic England

Sources

Books and journals
Beresford, M, Lost Villages of England, (1954), p381
Other
On site regarding finds by workers, JEFFERY, P.P., Discussion with Mr Greves (occupier), (1993)
On site regarding interpretation of., JEFFERY, P.P., Discussion with Mr Greves (occupier), (1993)
PRN 11,217, C.A.O., Langley Palace, (1975)
PRN 11,217, C.A.O., Royal Hunting Lodge, (1975)
PRN 3312, C.A.O., Deserted Medieval Village, (1975)
PRN 3312, C.A.O., Deserted Medieval Village, Moat, (1975)
SP 21 NE 15, Ordnance Survey, Earthworks 15/ 16c, (1977)
SP 21 NE 15, Ordnance Survey, Hunting Lodge (site), (1977)
Title: Oxford and surrounding area
Source Date: 1985
Author:
Publisher:
Surveyor:
1:50000 Landranger series sheet 164
Title: Oxford and surrounding area
Source Date: 1985
Author:
Publisher:
Surveyor:
Landranger Series sheet 164
With Agent at Carter Jonas, Oxford, JEFFERY, P.P., Discussion on telephone, (1993)
With Mr Greves re: site and history, JEFFERY, P.P., Discussion on site, (1993)

Source: Historic England

Other nearby scheduled monuments

AncientMonuments.uk is an independent online resource and is not associated with any government department. All government data published here is used under licence. Please do not contact AncientMonuments.uk for any queries related to any individual ancient or schedued monument, planning permission related to scheduled monuments or the scheduling process itself.

AncientMonuments.uk is a Good Stuff website.